English Practice Question and Answer

Q:

In the questions given below, choose the word most opposite in meaning to the given word and mark your answer.

CHEERFUL

1449 0

  • 1
    Expensive
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    Careless
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    Sad
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    Happy
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 3. "Sad"

Q:

Read the following passage carefully and answer the given questions.
It is impossible for a well-educated, intellectual or brave man to make money the chief object of his thought, just as it is for him to make his dinner the principal object of them. All healthy people like their dinners, but their dinner is not the main object of their lives. So all healthy-minded people like making money-ought to like it, and to enjoy the sensation of winning it, but the main object of their life is not money, it is something better than money. A good soldier, for instance mainly wishes to do his fighting well. He is glad of his pay, very properly so, and justly grumbles when you keep him ten years without it - still his main notion of life is to win battles not to be paid for winning them. So of the doctor. They like fees, no doubt, ought to like them, yet if they are brave and well-educated, the entire object of their lives is not fees. They, on the whole, desire to cure the sick, and if they are good doctors, and the choice were fairly put to them, they would rather cure their patient, and lose the fees, than kill him and get it. And so with all other brave and rightly trained men, their work is first, their fees second - very important, no doubt, but still second. But in every nation, there are a vast number of people who are ill-educated, cowardly and stupid. And with these people, just as certainly the fee is first and work second, as with brave people the work is first and fee second.

The writer’s main argument in the passage is -

1449 0

  • 1
    that money is not the main object in life for all right-thinking people
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    that money is the main object in life for all right-thinking people
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    that money is the main object in life for some right-thinking people
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    that society is not important at all for all right-thinking people.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 1. "that money is not the main object in life for all right-thinking people"

Q:

Select the option that expresses the given sentence in direct speech.

Hira inquired how I was doing being all alone in my house.

1449 0

  • 1
    Hira said to me, “Are you doing fine being all alone in your house.”
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    Hira said to me, “How are you doing being all alone in my house.”
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    Hira said to me, “How are you doing being all alone in your house?”
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    Hira said to me, “How you are doing being all alone in your house?”
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 3. "Hira said to me, “How are you doing being all alone in your house?”"

Q:

Read the following passage carefully and give the answer of following questions.

The problem of water pollution by pesticides can be understood only in context, as part of the whole to which it belongs – the pollution of the total environment of mankind. The pollution entering our waterways comes from many sources, radioactive wastes from reactors, laboratories and hospitals; fallout from nuclear explosions; domestic wastes from cities and towns; chemical wastes from factories. To these is a added a new kid of fallout - the chemical sprays applied to crop lands and gardens, forests and fields. Many of the chemical agents in this alarming melange initiate and augment the harmful effects of radiation, and within the groups of chemicals themselves there are sinister and little - understood interactions, transformations and summations of effect.

Ever since the chemists began to manufacture substances that nature never invented, the problem of water purification have become complex and the danger to users of water has increased. As we have seen, the production of these synthetic chemicals in large volume began in the 1940’s. It has now reached such proportion that an appalling deluge of chemical pollution is daily poured into the nation’s waterways. When inextricably mixed with domestic and other wastes discharged into the same water, these chemicals sometimes defy detection by the methods in ordinary use by purification plants. Most of them are so complex that they cannot be identified. In rivers, a really incredible variety of pollutants combine to produce deposits that sanitary engineers can only despairingly refer to as “gunk”.

The main argument of paragraph 1 is:

1449 0

  • 1
    that there are sinister interaction the use of chemicals.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    that there are numerous reason for contamination of water supplies.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    that there are many dangers from nuclear fallout.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    that pesticides are dangerous.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 2. "that there are numerous reason for contamination of water supplies."

Q:

AMALGAMATE 

1448 0

  • 1
    assimilate
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    integrate
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    separate
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    combine
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 3. "separate "

Q:

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain parts are given in bold to answer some of the questions based on the passage.
 Sometimes to upend entrenched power structures, a revolution is required. Naming and shaming powerful men in the #Metoo campaign is in many ways a revolutionary act. The truth about most was known, spoken in whispers, but not to their face. But now that omerta has been broken by some intrepid women , there’s a palpable sense of power and possibility. 

Revolutions are by definition anarchic, as they are aimed against those who make and enforce the rules. So it has been with #MeToo. Men are named, sometimes anonymously, and the naming itself requires punitive action to be taken against them. There isn’t really any room for discussion on context or degree of culpability. Some have raised questions about due process, and the response has been, somewhat reasonably, that due process has failed. And it is true, arguing for due process when due process has failed feels a bit like batting for status quo. So let it be said, #MeToo despite its limitations is unreservedly a good development. However, the question is, what next? The #MeToo movement is more than just outing powerful men, it is about shifting the balance of power between men and women, transferring the punitive aspects — shame, denial of work opportunities — from the victim to the perpetrator. It is about ending impunity embedded in our social construct by shaping new social mores. This is and has to be a collective effort, and it is important for the #MeToo movement to have these discussions.

Let the burden of shame now be shifted to where it is supposed to- the perpetrators and not the women; the victims. It’s the woman who has to hide from the world. And by and large, due to this very fact prevailing in Indian society that many women ultimately choose to leave their jobs, or seek employment elsewhere, when they confront inappropriate behaviour from their colleagues.

Another very important aspect which should be taken care of is that of equality, where there’s no inhibitions, no sense of caution. Women need healthy camaraderie in place of needless caution. Respect, not condescension. They would like colleagues to engage with them, not be patronising. And the fact that they are still having to demand these is telling.

Which one of the following is most similar in meaning to “INTREPID” ?

1448 0

  • 1
    adventurous
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    docile
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    submissive
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    fearless
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 5
    rash
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 4. "fearless"

Q:

The following sentence has been divided into parts. One of them contains an error. Select the part that contains the error from the given options.

No sooner did Priya / get her report card / when she started jumping / with joy.

1448 0

  • 1
    get her report card
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    with joy
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    No sooner did Priya
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    when she started jumping
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 4. "when she started jumping"
Explanation :

The correct form should be "No sooner did Priya get her report card than she started jumping with joy." The conjunction "when" should be replaced with "than."

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully