English Practice Question and Answer

Q:

Select the most appropriate synonym of the given word.

TRIVIAL

1188 0

  • 1
    warm
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    essential
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    meaningful
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    superficial
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 4. "superficial"

Q:

Select the option that can be used as a one-word substitute for the given group of words.

Something happening in three years

1188 0

  • 1
    Annual
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    Triennial
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    Biennial
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    Millennial
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 2. "Triennial "
Explanation :

Triennial refers to something happening every three years, providing the one-word substitute for the given context.


Q:

Direction : Read the following passage carefully and answer the question given below it. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the question.
 Governments have traditionally equated economic progress with steel mills and cement factories. While urban centers thrive and city dwellers get rich, hundreds of millions of farmers remain mired in poverty. However fears of food shortages, a rethinking of anti-poverty priorities and the crushing recession in 2008 are causing a dramatic shift in world economic policy in favour of greater support for agriculture.
 The last time when the world’s farmer felt such love was in the 1970s. At that time, as food prices spiked, there was real concern that the world was facing a crisis in which the planet was simply unable to produce enough grain and meat for an expanding population. Government across the developing world and international aid organisations plowed investment into agriculture in the early 1970s, while technological breakthroughs, like high-yield strains of important food crops, boosted production. The result was the Green Revolution and food production exploded. But the Green Revolution became a victim of its own success. Food prices plunged by some 60% by the late 1980s from their peak in the mid-1970s. Policy makers and aid workers turned their attention to the poor’s other pressing needs such as health care and education. Farming got starved of resources and investment. By 2004 aid directed at agriculture sank to 3.5 % and Agriculture lost its glitter. Also as consumer in high-growth giants such as China and India became wealthier they began eating more meat so grain once used for human consumption got diverted to beef up livestock. By early 2008 panicked buying by importing countries and restrictions slapped on grain exports by some big producers helped drive prices upto heights not seen for three decades. Making matters worse land and resources got reallocated to produce cash crops such as biofuels and the result was that voluminous reserves of grain evaporated. Protests broke out across the emerging world and fierce food riots toppled governments. This spurred global leaders into action. This made them aware that food security is one of the fundamental issues in the world that has to be dealt with in order to maintain administrative and political stability. This also spurred the US which traditionally provisioned food aid from American grain surpluses to help needy nations to move towards investing in farm sectors around the globe to boost productive for themselves and be in a better position to feed their own people.
 Africa, which missed out on the first Green Revolution due to poor policy and limited resources, also witnessed a 'change'. Swayed by the success of East Asia the primary poverty-fighting method favoured by many policy-makers in Africa was to get farmers off their farms and into modern jobs in factories and urban centers. But that strategy proved to be highly insufficient. Income levels in the countryside badly trailed those in cities while the FAO estimated that the number of poor going hungry in 2009 reached an all time high at more than one billion. In India on the other hand with only 40% of its farmland irrigated, entire economic boom currently underway is held hostage by the unpredictable monsoon. With much of India’s farming areas suffering from drought this year, the government will have a tough time meeting its economic growth targets. In a report Goldman Sachs, predicted that if this year, too receives weak rains it could cause agriculture to contract by 2 % this fiscal year making the government 7%GDP growth target look "a bit rich". Another green revolution is the need of the hour and to make it a reality, the global community still has much backbreaking farm work to do.           

What prompted leaders throughout the world to take action to boost the agriculture sector in 2008?

1187 0

  • 1
    Coercive tactics by the US which restricted food aid to poor nations
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    The realisation of the link between food security and political stability
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    Awareness that performance in agriculture is necessary in order to achieve the targeted GDP
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    Reports that high-growth countries like China and India were boosting their agriculture sectors to capture the international markets
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 5
    Their desire to influence developing nations to slow down their industrial development
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 2. "The realisation of the link between food security and political stability"

Q:

In the questions given below, choose the word most opposite in meaning to the given word and mark your answer.

Ribald

1187 0

  • 1
    Clean
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    Vulgar
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    Provision
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    Biased
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 1. "Clean"

Q:

Parts of the following sentence are given as options. Identify the segment that contains a grammatical error.

The reason for visiting Meerut was because my mother needed to be looked after.

1186 0

  • 1
    to be looked after
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    The reason for visiting
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    my mother needed
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    was because
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 4. "was because"

Q:

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the questions.
   
Indeed the western recession is really the beginning of good news for India! But to understand that we will have to move away for a while from the topic of western recession . . . . . . . to the Japanese recession! For years the Japanese style of management has been admired. However, over the last decade or so, one key question has sprung up ‘if Japanese management style is as wonderful as described then why has Japan been in a recession for more than a decade?'
The answer to this question is very simple. Culture plays a very important part in shaping up economies. What succeeds in one culture fails in another. Japanese are basically nonmaterialistic. And however rich they become, unlike others, they cannot just keep throwing and buying endlessly. And once they have everything they need; there is a saturation point. It was only when companies like Toyota realized that they cannot keep selling cars endlessly to their home market that they went really aggressive in the western markets-and the rest is history. Japanese companies grew bigger by catering to the world markets when their home markets shrunk.

served equally well. They were lured through advertising and marketing techniques of ‘dustbinisation' of the customer; and then finally, once they became ready customers, they were given loans and credits to help them buy more and more. When all the creditworthy people were given loans to a logical limit, they ceased to be a part of the market. Even this would have been understandable if it could work as an eye-opener. Instead of taking the 'Right Step' as Toyota did, they preferred to take a 'shortcut'. Now banks went to the noncredit worthy people and gave them loans. The people expectedly defaulted and the entire system collapsed.

Now like Toyota western companies will learn to find new markets. They will now lean towards India because of its common man! The billion-plus population in the next 25 years will become, a consuming middle-class. Finally, there will be a real surge in income of these people and in the next fifty odd years, one can really hope to see an equal world in terms of material plenty, with poverty being almost nonexistent! And this will happen not by selling more cars to Americans and Europeans. It will happen by creating markets in India, China, Latin America and Africa, by giving their people purchasing power and by making products for them.
The recession has made us realize that it is not because of worse management techniques, but because of limits to growth. And they will realize that it is great for planet earth. After all, how many cars and houses must the rich own before calling it enough? It's time for them to look at others as well. Many years back, to increase his own profits, Henry Ford had started paying his workers more, so that they could buy his cars. In similar fashion, now the developed world will pay the developing world people so that they can buy their cars and washing machines.
The recession will kick - start the process of making the entire world more prosperous, and lay the foundation of limits to growth in the west and the foundation of real globalization in the world - of the globalization of prosperity. And one of its first beneficiaries will be India. 

Why according to the author is the current recession great for ‘Planet Earth’?
(A) It will make people non-materialistic like the Japanese.
(B) The unlimited market growth which caused hazards to the environment would be checked to a certain extent.
(C) Banks will now provide loan only to the creditworthy people.
(D) Developing countries will also be benefited by shifted markets.

1186 0

  • 1
    Only A
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    Only B and D
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    Only A and B
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    Only B
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 5
    None of these
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 2. "Only B and D"

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully