English प्रश्न और उत्तर का अभ्यास करें

प्र:

Select the option that will improve the underlined part of the given sentence.

I guessed her feelings when she started crying.

1307 0

  • 1
    estimated her emotions
    सही
    गलत
  • 2
    estimated her rejoinders
    सही
    गलत
  • 3
    estimated her reactions
    सही
    गलत
  • 4
    estimated her ripostes
    सही
    गलत
  • उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
  • Workspace

उत्तर : 1. "estimated her emotions"

प्र:

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/phrases are given in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the questions.

Core competencies and focus are now the mantras of corporate strategists in Western economies. But while managers in the West have dismantled many conglomerates assembled in the 1960s and 1970s, the large, diversified business group remains the dominant form of enterprise throughout most emerging markets. Some groups operate as holding companies with full ownership in many enterprises, others are collections of publicly traded companies, but all have some degree of central control.

As emerging markets open up to global competition, consultants and foreign investors are increasingly pressuring these groups to conform to Western practice by scaling back the scope of their business activities. The conglomerate is the dinosaur of organizational design, they argue, too unwieldy and slow to compete in today's fast-paced markets. Already a number of executives have decided to break up their groups in order to show that they are focusing on only a few core businesses. 

There are reasons to worry about this trend. Focus is good advice in New York or London, but something important gets lost in translation when that advice is given to groups in emerging markets. Western companies take for granted a range of institutions that support their business activities, but many of these institutions are absent in other regions of the world. Without effective securities regulation and venture capital firms, for example, focused companies may be unable to raise adequate financing; and without strong educational institutions, they will struggle to hire skilled employees.

Communicating with customers is difficult when the local infrastructure is poor, and unpredictable government behavior can stymie any operation, although a focused strategy may enable a company to perform a few activities well, companies in emerging markets must take responsibility for a wide range of functions in order to do business effectively. 

In the case of product markets, buyers and sellers usually suffer from a severe dearth of information for three reasons. First, the communications infrastructure in emerging markets is often under-developed. Even as wireless communication spreads throughout the West, vast stretches in countries such as China and India remain without telephones. Power shortages often render the modes of communication that do exist ineffective. The postal service is typically inefficient, slow, or unreliable; and the private sector rarely provides efficient courier services. High rates of illiteracy make it difficult for marketers to communicate effectively with customers. 

Second, even when information about products does get around, there are no mechanisms to corroborate the claims made by sellers. Independent consumer - information organizations are rare, and government watchdog agencies are of little use. The few analysts who rate products are generally less sophisticated than their counterparts in advanced economies. 

Third, consumers have no redress mechanisms if a product does not deliver on its promise. Law enforcement is often capricious and so slow that few who assign any value to time would resort to it. Unlike in advanced markets, there are few extrajudicial arbitration mechanisms to which one can appeal. 

As a result of this lack of information, companies in emerging markets face much higher costs in building credible brands than their counterparts in advanced economies. In turn, established brands wield tremendous power. A conglomerate with a reputation for quality products and services can use its group name to enter new businesses, even if those businesses are completely unrelated to its current lines. Groups also have an advantage when they do try to build up a brand because they can spread the cost of maintaining it across multiple lines of business. Such groups then have a greater incentive not to damage brand quality in anyone business because they will pay the price in their other businesses as well.

Established brands can wield tremendous power in emerging markets because 

1307 0

  • 1
    a conglomerate with a reputation for quality products and services can use its group name to enter new businesses.
    सही
    गलत
  • 2
    they have much political nexus and strong man power
    सही
    गलत
  • 3
    they have excess of money and customers
    सही
    गलत
  • 4
    they have greater incentive to damage brand quality in any one business
    सही
    गलत
  • 5
    None of these
    सही
    गलत
  • उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
  • Workspace

उत्तर : 1. "a conglomerate with a reputation for quality products and services can use its group name to enter new businesses."

प्र:

Fill in the blanks by choosing an appropriate alternative. 

I didn't have …………………………. money, so I had to borrow………………………….

1307 0

  • 1
    some, any
    सही
    गलत
  • 2
    any, some
    सही
    गलत
  • 3
    some, some
    सही
    गलत
  • 4
    any, any
    सही
    गलत
  • उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
  • Workspace

उत्तर : 2. "any, some "

प्र:

Select the most appropriate synonym of the given word.

Courage

1306 0

  • 1
    Meekness
    सही
    गलत
  • 2
    Valour
    सही
    गलत
  • 3
    Humility
    सही
    गलत
  • 4
    Timidity
    सही
    गलत
  • उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
  • Workspace

उत्तर : 2. "Valour"

प्र:

"Back up" Find the idioms. 

1306 0

  • 1
    Give moral support
    सही
    गलत
  • 2
    Pull back from
    सही
    गलत
  • 3
    Back-bencher
    सही
    गलत
  • 4
    Stay behind
    सही
    गलत
  • उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
  • Workspace

उत्तर : 1. "Give moral support"

प्र:

Direction : Read the following passage carefully and answer the question given below it. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the question.
 Governments have traditionally equated economic progress with steel mills and cement factories. While urban centers thrive and city dwellers get rich, hundreds of millions of farmers remain mired in poverty. However fears of food shortages, a rethinking of anti-poverty priorities and the crushing recession in 2008 are causing a dramatic shift in world economic policy in favour of greater support for agriculture.
 The last time when the world’s farmer felt such love was in the 1970s. At that time, as food prices spiked, there was real concern that the world was facing a crisis in which the planet was simply unable to produce enough grain and meat for an expanding population. Government across the developing world and international aid organisations plowed investment into agriculture in the early 1970s, while technological breakthroughs, like high-yield strains of important food crops, boosted production. The result was the Green Revolution and food production exploded. But the Green Revolution became a victim of its own success. Food prices plunged by some 60% by the late 1980s from their peak in the mid-1970s. Policy makers and aid workers turned their attention to the poor’s other pressing needs such as health care and education. Farming got starved of resources and investment. By 2004 aid directed at agriculture sank to 3.5 % and Agriculture lost its glitter. Also as consumer in high-growth giants such as China and India became wealthier they began eating more meat so grain once used for human consumption got diverted to beef up livestock. By early 2008 panicked buying by importing countries and restrictions slapped on grain exports by some big producers helped drive prices upto heights not seen for three decades. Making matters worse land and resources got reallocated to produce cash crops such as biofuels and the result was that voluminous reserves of grain evaporated. Protests broke out across the emerging world and fierce food riots toppled governments. This spurred global leaders into action. This made them aware that food security is one of the fundamental issues in the world that has to be dealt with in order to maintain administrative and political stability. This also spurred the US which traditionally provisioned food aid from American grain surpluses to help needy nations to move towards investing in farm sectors around the globe to boost productive for themselves and be in a better position to feed their own people.
 Africa, which missed out on the first Green Revolution due to poor policy and limited resources, also witnessed a 'change'. Swayed by the success of East Asia the primary poverty-fighting method favoured by many policy-makers in Africa was to get farmers off their farms and into modern jobs in factories and urban centers. But that strategy proved to be highly insufficient. Income levels in the countryside badly trailed those in cities while the FAO estimated that the number of poor going hungry in 2009 reached an all time high at more than one billion. In India on the other hand with only 40% of its farmland irrigated, entire economic boom currently underway is held hostage by the unpredictable monsoon. With much of India’s farming areas suffering from drought this year, the government will have a tough time meeting its economic growth targets. In a report Goldman Sachs, predicted that if this year, too receives weak rains it could cause agriculture to contract by 2 % this fiscal year making the government 7%GDP growth target look "a bit rich". Another green revolution is the need of the hour and to make it a reality, the global community still has much backbreaking farm work to do.           

What motivated the US to focus on investing in agriculture across the globe?

1306 0

  • 1
    To make developing countries become more reliant on US aid
    सही
    गलत
  • 2
    To ensure grain surpluses so that the US had no need to import food
    सही
    गलत
  • 3
    To make those countries more self-sufficient to whom it previously provided food
    सही
    गलत
  • 4
    To establish itself in the market before the high growth giants such as India and China could establish themselves
    सही
    गलत
  • 5
    None of these
    सही
    गलत
  • उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
  • Workspace

उत्तर : 3. "To make those countries more self-sufficient to whom it previously provided food"

प्र:

Directions: Which of the phrases given below should replace the word/phrase that is underlined in the sentence to make it grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is given and no correction is required, mark No correction required' as the answer.

I am going to has a party If I score well in my exams.

1306 0

  • 1
    No correction required
    सही
    गलत
  • 2
    going to have
    सही
    गलत
  • 3
    going to had
    सही
    गलत
  • 4
    going having
    सही
    गलत
  • 5
    going of having
    सही
    गलत
  • उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
  • Workspace

उत्तर : 2. "going to have"

      त्रुटि की रिपोर्ट करें

    कृपया संदेश दर्ज करें
    त्रुटि रिपोर्ट सफलतापूर्वक जमा हुई

      त्रुटि की रिपोर्ट करें

    कृपया संदेश दर्ज करें
    त्रुटि रिपोर्ट सफलतापूर्वक जमा हुई

      त्रुटि की रिपोर्ट करें

    कृपया संदेश दर्ज करें
    त्रुटि रिपोर्ट सफलतापूर्वक जमा हुई

      त्रुटि की रिपोर्ट करें

    कृपया संदेश दर्ज करें
    त्रुटि रिपोर्ट सफलतापूर्वक जमा हुई

      त्रुटि की रिपोर्ट करें

    कृपया संदेश दर्ज करें
    त्रुटि रिपोर्ट सफलतापूर्वक जमा हुई

      त्रुटि की रिपोर्ट करें

    कृपया संदेश दर्ज करें
    त्रुटि रिपोर्ट सफलतापूर्वक जमा हुई

      त्रुटि की रिपोर्ट करें

    कृपया संदेश दर्ज करें
    त्रुटि रिपोर्ट सफलतापूर्वक जमा हुई

      त्रुटि की रिपोर्ट करें

    कृपया संदेश दर्ज करें
    त्रुटि रिपोर्ट सफलतापूर्वक जमा हुई