English Practice Question and Answer

Q:

Identify the best way to improve the Bold part of the given sentence. If there is no improvement required, select ‘no improvement’-

I don’t want a Mr.John who works in the Accounts office; I want the other Mr.John.

1327 0

  • 1
    Mr. John
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    the Mr.John
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    a one Mr.John
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    No improvement
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 2. "the Mr.John"

Q:

Select the most appropriate meaning of the given idiom.

In the same breath

1327 0

  • 1
    Able to get a foul smell
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    Say two contradictory things at the same time
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    Practice breathing exercises
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    Try and hold your breath
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 2. "Say two contradictory things at the same time"
Explanation :

"In the same breath" refers to saying two contradictory things simultaneously or in close succession.

Q:

Direction : Read the following passage carefully and answer the question given below it. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the question.
 Governments have traditionally equated economic progress with steel mills and cement factories. While urban centers thrive and city dwellers get rich, hundreds of millions of farmers remain mired in poverty. However fears of food shortages, a rethinking of anti-poverty priorities and the crushing recession in 2008 are causing a dramatic shift in world economic policy in favour of greater support for agriculture.
 The last time when the world’s farmer felt such love was in the 1970s. At that time, as food prices spiked, there was real concern that the world was facing a crisis in which the planet was simply unable to produce enough grain and meat for an expanding population. Government across the developing world and international aid organisations plowed investment into agriculture in the early 1970s, while technological breakthroughs, like high-yield strains of important food crops, boosted production. The result was the Green Revolution and food production exploded. But the Green Revolution became a victim of its own success. Food prices plunged by some 60% by the late 1980s from their peak in the mid-1970s. Policy makers and aid workers turned their attention to the poor’s other pressing needs such as health care and education. Farming got starved of resources and investment. By 2004 aid directed at agriculture sank to 3.5 % and Agriculture lost its glitter. Also as consumer in high-growth giants such as China and India became wealthier they began eating more meat so grain once used for human consumption got diverted to beef up livestock. By early 2008 panicked buying by importing countries and restrictions slapped on grain exports by some big producers helped drive prices upto heights not seen for three decades. Making matters worse land and resources got reallocated to produce cash crops such as biofuels and the result was that voluminous reserves of grain evaporated. Protests broke out across the emerging world and fierce food riots toppled governments. This spurred global leaders into action. This made them aware that food security is one of the fundamental issues in the world that has to be dealt with in order to maintain administrative and political stability. This also spurred the US which traditionally provisioned food aid from American grain surpluses to help needy nations to move towards investing in farm sectors around the globe to boost productive for themselves and be in a better position to feed their own people.
 Africa, which missed out on the first Green Revolution due to poor policy and limited resources, also witnessed a 'change'. Swayed by the success of East Asia the primary poverty-fighting method favoured by many policy-makers in Africa was to get farmers off their farms and into modern jobs in factories and urban centers. But that strategy proved to be highly insufficient. Income levels in the countryside badly trailed those in cities while the FAO estimated that the number of poor going hungry in 2009 reached an all time high at more than one billion. In India on the other hand with only 40% of its farmland irrigated, entire economic boom currently underway is held hostage by the unpredictable monsoon. With much of India’s farming areas suffering from drought this year, the government will have a tough time meeting its economic growth targets. In a report Goldman Sachs, predicted that if this year, too receives weak rains it could cause agriculture to contract by 2 % this fiscal year making the government 7%GDP growth target look "a bit rich". Another green revolution is the need of the hour and to make it a reality, the global community still has much backbreaking farm work to do.           

What is the author’s main objective in writing the passage?

1327 0

  • 1
    Criticising developed countries for not bolstering economic growth in poor nations
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    Analysing the disadvantages of the Green Revolution
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    Persuading experts that a strong economy depends on industrialisation and not on agriculture
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    Making a case for the international society to engineer a second Green Revolution
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 5
    Rationalising the faulty agriculture policies of emerging countries
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 4. "Making a case for the international society to engineer a second Green Revolution"

Q:

Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow-
Parents all over Iceland’s capital Reykjavik embark on a two-hour evening walk around their neighbourhood every weekend, checking on youth hangouts as a 10 pm curfew approaches.The walk in Reykjavik is one step toward Iceland’s success into turning around a crisis in teenage drinking.Focusing on local participation and promoting more music and sports options for students, the island nation in the North Atlantic has dried up a teenage culture of drinking and smoking. Icelandic teenagers now have one of the lowest rates of substance abuse in Europe.The Icelandic Centre for Social Research and Analysis, the institute pioneering the project for the past two decades, says it currently advises 100 communities in 23 countries, from Finland to Chile, on cutting teenage substance abuse. “The key to success is to create healthy communities and by that get healthy individuals, ” said Inga Dora Sigfusdottir, a sociology professor who founded the Youth of Iceland programme, which now has rebranded as Planet Youth.The secret, she says, is to keep young people busy and parents engaged without talking much about drugs or alcohol. That stands in sharp contrast to other anti-abuse programmes which try to sway teenagers with school lectures and scary, disgusting ads showing smokers’ rotten lungs or eggs in a frying pan to represent an intoxicated brain.
“Telling teenagers not to use drugs can backlash and actually get them curious to try them,” Ms Sigfusdottir said. In 1999, when thousands of teenagers would gather in Reykjavik every weekend, surveys showed 56% of Icelandic 16-year-olds drank alcohol and about as many had tried smoking.
Years later, Iceland has the lowest rates for drinking and smoking among the 35 countries measured in the 2015 European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs. On average, 80% of European 16-year-olds have tasted alcohol at least once, compared with 35% in Iceland, the only country where more than half of those students completely abstains from alcohol.
Denmark, another wealthy Nordic country, has the highest rates of teenage drinking, along with Greece, Hungary and the Czech Republic, where 92% to 96% have consumed alcohol. In the US, teen drinking is a significant health concern, because many US teenagers are driving cars and do not have access to good public transport like teenagers in Europe.
Reykjavik mayor Dagur B. Eggertsson said the Icelandic plan “is all about society giving better options” for teens than substance abuse. He believes the wide variety of opportunities that now keep students busy and inspired has dramatically altered the country’s youth culture. Local municipalities like Reykjavik have invested in sport halls, music schools and youth centres.To make the programmes widely available, parents are offered a 500 US dollar
annual voucher toward sports or music programmes for their children.

Researchers say the Planet Youth prevention model is evolving constantly because it is based on annual surveys to detect trends and measure policy effectiveness. By law, introduced when Icelandic police routinely dealt with alcohol-fuelled street gatherings, children under 12 are not allowed to be outside after 8pm without parents and those 13 to 16 not past 10pm. “We tell the kids if they are out too late, polite and nice, and then they go home,” said Heidar Atlason, a veteran member of the patrol. Over Iceland’s harsh winter, one parent admits, evenings sometimes pass without running into any students.

The word from the passage that means ‘change the image of an organisation or program’ is-

1327 0

  • 1
    rebrand
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    embark
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    abstain
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    invest
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 1. "rebrand"

Q:

Choose the correct form of Passive Transformation of the sentence given:
 Who gave you the permission to write? 

1327 0

  • 1
    By whom were you given the permission to write?
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    By whom given you the permission to write?
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    By whom you were been given the permission?
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    By whom was you given permission to write?
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 1. "By whom were you given the permission to write?"

Q:

Select the most appropriate meaning of the given idiom.

The movers and shakers

1327 0

  • 1
    People who have a lot of power and influence
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    Transportation company
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    Labourers
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    Travelling agency
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 1. "People who have a lot of power and influence"
Explanation :

The literal meaning of movers and shakers is those who move and shake. Idioms have deep meanings and are connected to a common understanding. The people who can move and shake things. This is only possible if those people had power and the right influence.

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully