Practice Question and Answer
8 Q: यदि एक दुकानदार 5 रुपये में 2 संतरे खरीद कर 7 रुपये में ही 3 बेच देता है, तो उसे फायदा हुआ की हानि और कितने प्रतिशत का ?
1212 0632287bdcb090a254fcd99f6
632287bdcb090a254fcd99f6- 16.66%true
- 210.66%false
- 312.66%false
- 42.66%false
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 1. "6.66%"
Q:Directions: In question four alternatives are given for the Idiom/Phrase underlined in the sentences. Choose the alternative which best expresses the meaning of the Idiom/Phrase and mark it is the Answer Sheet.
To set one's face against
1212 06035ddef77e7b7348dc310a1
6035ddef77e7b7348dc310a1- 1To judge by appearancefalse
- 2To oppose with determinationtrue
- 3To get out of difficultyfalse
- 4To look at one steadilyfalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 2. "To oppose with determination"
Q: अधिगम को प्रभावित करने वाले कारक हैं ?
1212 0603f76810634b252a6b6f079
603f76810634b252a6b6f079- 1भूख एवं परिपक्वताfalse
- 2प्रशंसा एवं निन्दाfalse
- 3शिक्षण-पद्धति एवं अभ्यासfalse
- 4उपरोक्त सभीtrue
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 4. "उपरोक्त सभी"
Q: राजस्थान के किन जिलों में मध्यम काली मिट्टी पाई जाती है?
1212 0637cc4f7c3515a3108480dbe
637cc4f7c3515a3108480dbe- 1कोटा - बूंदी - झालावाड़true
- 2उदयपुर - डूंगरपुर-बांसवाड़ाfalse
- 3टोंक - अजमेर - पालीfalse
- 4चूरू - झुंझुनू - सीकरfalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 1. "कोटा - बूंदी - झालावाड़"
Q: ₹45,000 के साथ A ने एक व्यापार शुरू किया । 6 महीने के बाद ₹80,000 के साथ B व्यापार में शामिल हो गया। 1 वर्ष के पश्चात C व्यापार में ₹1,20,000 निवेश करता है, तो दो साल में A, B तथा C के बीच लाभ किस अनुपात में बाटा जायेगा?
1212 06401dba40fa4111f871905f7
6401dba40fa4111f871905f7- 19: 16: 24false
- 23: 4: 4true
- 33: 4: 8false
- 43: 3: 8false
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 2. "3: 4: 4 "
Q:Direction : Read the following passage carefully and answer the question given below it. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the question.
Governments have traditionally equated economic progress with steel mills and cement factories. While urban centers thrive and city dwellers get rich, hundreds of millions of farmers remain mired in poverty. However fears of food shortages, a rethinking of anti-poverty priorities and the crushing recession in 2008 are causing a dramatic shift in world economic policy in favour of greater support for agriculture.
The last time when the world’s farmer felt such love was in the 1970s. At that time, as food prices spiked, there was real concern that the world was facing a crisis in which the planet was simply unable to produce enough grain and meat for an expanding population. Government across the developing world and international aid organisations plowed investment into agriculture in the early 1970s, while technological breakthroughs, like high-yield strains of important food crops, boosted production. The result was the Green Revolution and food production exploded. But the Green Revolution became a victim of its own success. Food prices plunged by some 60% by the late 1980s from their peak in the mid-1970s. Policy makers and aid workers turned their attention to the poor’s other pressing needs such as health care and education. Farming got starved of resources and investment. By 2004 aid directed at agriculture sank to 3.5 % and Agriculture lost its glitter. Also as consumer in high-growth giants such as China and India became wealthier they began eating more meat so grain once used for human consumption got diverted to beef up livestock. By early 2008 panicked buying by importing countries and restrictions slapped on grain exports by some big producers helped drive prices upto heights not seen for three decades. Making matters worse land and resources got reallocated to produce cash crops such as biofuels and the result was that voluminous reserves of grain evaporated. Protests broke out across the emerging world and fierce food riots toppled governments. This spurred global leaders into action. This made them aware that food security is one of the fundamental issues in the world that has to be dealt with in order to maintain administrative and political stability. This also spurred the US which traditionally provisioned food aid from American grain surpluses to help needy nations to move towards investing in farm sectors around the globe to boost productive for themselves and be in a better position to feed their own people.
Africa, which missed out on the first Green Revolution due to poor policy and limited resources, also witnessed a 'change'. Swayed by the success of East Asia the primary poverty-fighting method favoured by many policy-makers in Africa was to get farmers off their farms and into modern jobs in factories and urban centers. But that strategy proved to be highly insufficient. Income levels in the countryside badly trailed those in cities while the FAO estimated that the number of poor going hungry in 2009 reached an all time high at more than one billion. In India on the other hand with only 40% of its farmland irrigated, entire economic boom currently underway is held hostage by the unpredictable monsoon. With much of India’s farming areas suffering from drought this year, the government will have a tough time meeting its economic growth targets. In a report Goldman Sachs, predicted that if this year, too receives weak rains it could cause agriculture to contract by 2 % this fiscal year making the government 7%GDP growth target look "a bit rich". Another green revolution is the need of the hour and to make it a reality, the global community still has much backbreaking farm work to do.
What is the author trying to convey through the phrase making the government 7 % GDP growth target look a bit rich ?
1212 05ea6a040fb6adc33ce5beda2
5ea6a040fb6adc33ce5beda2Governments have traditionally equated economic progress with steel mills and cement factories. While urban centers thrive and city dwellers get rich, hundreds of millions of farmers remain mired in poverty. However fears of food shortages, a rethinking of anti-poverty priorities and the crushing recession in 2008 are causing a dramatic shift in world economic policy in favour of greater support for agriculture.
The last time when the world’s farmer felt such love was in the 1970s. At that time, as food prices spiked, there was real concern that the world was facing a crisis in which the planet was simply unable to produce enough grain and meat for an expanding population. Government across the developing world and international aid organisations plowed investment into agriculture in the early 1970s, while technological breakthroughs, like high-yield strains of important food crops, boosted production. The result was the Green Revolution and food production exploded. But the Green Revolution became a victim of its own success. Food prices plunged by some 60% by the late 1980s from their peak in the mid-1970s. Policy makers and aid workers turned their attention to the poor’s other pressing needs such as health care and education. Farming got starved of resources and investment. By 2004 aid directed at agriculture sank to 3.5 % and Agriculture lost its glitter. Also as consumer in high-growth giants such as China and India became wealthier they began eating more meat so grain once used for human consumption got diverted to beef up livestock. By early 2008 panicked buying by importing countries and restrictions slapped on grain exports by some big producers helped drive prices upto heights not seen for three decades. Making matters worse land and resources got reallocated to produce cash crops such as biofuels and the result was that voluminous reserves of grain evaporated. Protests broke out across the emerging world and fierce food riots toppled governments. This spurred global leaders into action. This made them aware that food security is one of the fundamental issues in the world that has to be dealt with in order to maintain administrative and political stability. This also spurred the US which traditionally provisioned food aid from American grain surpluses to help needy nations to move towards investing in farm sectors around the globe to boost productive for themselves and be in a better position to feed their own people.
Africa, which missed out on the first Green Revolution due to poor policy and limited resources, also witnessed a 'change'. Swayed by the success of East Asia the primary poverty-fighting method favoured by many policy-makers in Africa was to get farmers off their farms and into modern jobs in factories and urban centers. But that strategy proved to be highly insufficient. Income levels in the countryside badly trailed those in cities while the FAO estimated that the number of poor going hungry in 2009 reached an all time high at more than one billion. In India on the other hand with only 40% of its farmland irrigated, entire economic boom currently underway is held hostage by the unpredictable monsoon. With much of India’s farming areas suffering from drought this year, the government will have a tough time meeting its economic growth targets. In a report Goldman Sachs, predicted that if this year, too receives weak rains it could cause agriculture to contract by 2 % this fiscal year making the government 7%GDP growth target look "a bit rich". Another green revolution is the need of the hour and to make it a reality, the global community still has much backbreaking farm work to do.
- 1India is unlikely to achieve the targeted growth ratetrue
- 2Allocation of funds to agriculture has raised India’s chances of having a high GDPfalse
- 3Agriculture growth has artificially inflated India’s GDP and such growth is not realfalse
- 4India is likely to have one of the highest GDP growth ratesfalse
- 5A large portion of India’s GDP is contributed by agriculturefalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 1. "India is unlikely to achieve the targeted growth rate"
Q: फाइल का नाम अधिकतम कितने कैरेक्टर का हो सकता है?
1212 064b92cd82dc867f593041aa1
64b92cd82dc867f593041aa1- 1256 कैरेक्टर्सtrue
- 2156 कैरेक्टर्सfalse
- 3356 कैरेक्टर्सfalse
- 41024 कैरेक्टर्सfalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 1. "256 कैरेक्टर्स"
Explanation :
1. किसी वर्कशीट में किसी सेल में करैक्टरों की अधिकतम संख्या 256 हो सकती है।
2. एक फ़ाइल कंप्यूटर सिस्टम में एक कंटेनर है जो डेटा, सूचना, सेटिंग्स या कमांड संग्रहीत करता है, जिसका उपयोग कंप्यूटर प्रोग्राम के साथ किया जाता है।
3. ग्राफिकल यूजर इंटरफेस (जीयूआई) में, जैसे कि माइक्रोसॉफ्ट ऑपरेटिंग सिस्टम, फाइलों को आइकन के रूप में दर्शाते हैं, जो फाइल को खोलने वाले प्रोग्राम से जुड़ते हैं।
Q: अटल इनोवेशन मिशन के मिशन निदेशक किसे नियुक्त किया गया है?
1212 060743e4236363c0f94b97ee4
60743e4236363c0f94b97ee4- 1सोमनाथ बनर्जीfalse
- 2रननन रामथानfalse
- 3अनीश शाहfalse
- 4चिंतन वैष्णवtrue
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice

