प्रश्न और उत्तर का अभ्यास करें
8 प्र:Directions: Each question below has one blank, which is indicating that something has been omitted. Find out which option can be used to fill up the blank in the sentence in the same sequence to make it meaningfully complete.
Homemade gifts can be completely ___________to what the recipient likes.
2519 064ec86623be218b6cdd6e890
64ec86623be218b6cdd6e890- 1Altersfalse
- 2Firmedfalse
- 3Tailoredtrue
- 4Politefalse
- 5Liabilityfalse
- उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
उत्तर : 3. "Tailored "
प्र: What is separation in HRM? 2519 05b5cc68ee4d2b4197774c3c0
5b5cc68ee4d2b4197774c3c0- उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
उत्तर :
व्याख्या :
Separation of an employee exists when the service of an employee comes to an end because of one reason or other. "Separation of employment" refers broadly to the process of managing the termination of employment. It is a sensitive issue for any organization. Types of separation: 1) Volunntary: a) Resignationb) Job abandonment c) Retirement 2) Involuntary: a) Layoffb) Dismissalc) Plant closured) Death or Disability.
प्र:Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the questions.
A new analysis has determined that the threat of global warming can still be greatly diminished if nations cut emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases by 70% this century. The analysis was done by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). While global temperatures would rise, the most dangerous potential aspects of climate change, including massive losses of Arctic sea ice and permafrost and significant sea-level rise, could be partially avoided.
“This research indicates that we can no longer avoid significant warming during this century,” said NCAR scientist Warren Washington, the study paper's lead author. “But, if the world were to implement this level of emission cuts, we could stabilize the threat of climate change", he added.
Average global temperatures have warmed by close to 1 degree Celsius since the pre-industrial era. Much of the warming is due to human-produced emissions of greenhouse gases, predominantly carbon dioxide. This heat-trapping gas has increased from a pre-industrial level of about 284 parts per million ( ppm ) in the atmosphere to more than 380 ppm today. With research showing that additional warming of about 1 degree C may be the threshold for dangerous – climate change, the European Union has called for dramatic cuts in emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
To examine the impact of such cuts on the world's climate, Washing ton and his colleagues ran a series of global studies with the NCAR - based Community Climate System Model (CCSM). They assumed that carbon dioxide levels could be held to 450 ppm at the end of this century. In contrast, emissions are now on track to reach about 750 ppm by 2100 if unchecked. The team's results showed that if carbon dioxide were held to 450 ppm, global temperatures would increase by 0.6 degrees Celsius above current readings by the end of the century. In contrast, the study showed that temperatures would rise by almost four times that amount to 2.2 degrees Celsius above current readings if emissions were allowed to continue on their present course. Holding carbon dioxide levels to 450 ppm would have other impacts, according to the climate modeling study.
Sea-level rise due to thermal expansion as water temperatures warmed would be 14 centimeters about (5.5 inches) instead of 22 centimeters (8.7 inches). Also, Arctic ice in the summertime would shrink by about a quarter in volume and stabilize by 2100, as opposed to shrinking at least three quarters and continuing to melt, and Arctic warming would be reduced by almost half.
Why has the European Union called for dramatic cuts in carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions?
2519 05d9dc1ece215617fef761455
5d9dc1ece215617fef761455A new analysis has determined that the threat of global warming can still be greatly diminished if nations cut emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases by 70% this century. The analysis was done by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). While global temperatures would rise, the most dangerous potential aspects of climate change, including massive losses of Arctic sea ice and permafrost and significant sea-level rise, could be partially avoided.
“This research indicates that we can no longer avoid significant warming during this century,” said NCAR scientist Warren Washington, the study paper's lead author. “But, if the world were to implement this level of emission cuts, we could stabilize the threat of climate change", he added.
Average global temperatures have warmed by close to 1 degree Celsius since the pre-industrial era. Much of the warming is due to human-produced emissions of greenhouse gases, predominantly carbon dioxide. This heat-trapping gas has increased from a pre-industrial level of about 284 parts per million ( ppm ) in the atmosphere to more than 380 ppm today. With research showing that additional warming of about 1 degree C may be the threshold for dangerous – climate change, the European Union has called for dramatic cuts in emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
To examine the impact of such cuts on the world's climate, Washing ton and his colleagues ran a series of global studies with the NCAR - based Community Climate System Model (CCSM). They assumed that carbon dioxide levels could be held to 450 ppm at the end of this century. In contrast, emissions are now on track to reach about 750 ppm by 2100 if unchecked. The team's results showed that if carbon dioxide were held to 450 ppm, global temperatures would increase by 0.6 degrees Celsius above current readings by the end of the century. In contrast, the study showed that temperatures would rise by almost four times that amount to 2.2 degrees Celsius above current readings if emissions were allowed to continue on their present course. Holding carbon dioxide levels to 450 ppm would have other impacts, according to the climate modeling study.
Sea-level rise due to thermal expansion as water temperatures warmed would be 14 centimeters about (5.5 inches) instead of 22 centimeters (8.7 inches). Also, Arctic ice in the summertime would shrink by about a quarter in volume and stabilize by 2100, as opposed to shrinking at least three quarters and continuing to melt, and Arctic warming would be reduced by almost half.
- 1As global warming is not an issue of concernfalse
- 2As the temperatures may rise almost by an additional one degree and this may lead to severe climate changetrue
- 3As the NCAR has forced the European Union to announce the cuts.false
- 4As all the nations have decided to cut emissions of carbon dioxide.false
- 5None of these.false
- उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
उत्तर : 2. "As the temperatures may rise almost by an additional one degree and this may lead to severe climate change"
व्याख्या :
undefined
प्र: एक लड़की की ओर इशारा करते हुए संदीप ने कहा, "वह मेरे पिता की इकलौती बहन की बेटी है।" लड़की से संदीप का क्या संबंध है?
2519 05eec591e3716d10a7a4c1c61
5eec591e3716d10a7a4c1c61- 1अंकलfalse
- 2चचेरा भाईtrue
- 3पिताfalse
- 4दादाfalse
- उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
उत्तर : 2. "चचेरा भाई"
प्र: वह खोंजे जो निम्न में से सम्बन्धित नहीं है। वृत्त, वर्ग, आयत, त्रिभुज, अष्टकोण
2519 05ebcf30cd33dc17bd4958fb9
5ebcf30cd33dc17bd4958fb9- 1वर्गfalse
- 2वृत्तtrue
- 3त्रिभुजfalse
- 4अष्टकोणfalse
- उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
उत्तर : 2. "वृत्त"
प्र: नीचे दिए गए प्रश्न में, दो कथन I और II के दो निष्कर्ष दिए गए हैं। आपको दो कथनों को सत्य मानना है, भले ही वे सामान्य रूप से ज्ञात तथ्यों से भिन्न प्रतीत होते हों और फिर तय करें कि दिए गए कथनों में से कौन सा निष्कर्ष तार्किक रूप से दिए गए कथनों से भिन्न है।
कथन
कुछ वलय, वृत्त है।
कोई वृत्त, वर्ग नही है।
निष्कर्ष
कोई वलय, वर्ग नहीं है।
सभी वलय, वर्ग है।
2519 05d4c0a4d0c5c9f706c69a99b
5d4c0a4d0c5c9f706c69a99b- 1यदि केवल निष्कर्ष I अनुसरण करता हैtrue
- 2यदि केवल निष्कर्ष II अनुसरण करता हैfalse
- 3यदि या तो निष्कर्ष I या निष्कर्ष II अनुसरण करता हैfalse
- 4यदि न तो निष्कर्ष I और न ही निष्कर्ष II अनुसरण करता हैfalse
- 5यदि दोनों निष्कर्ष I और II अनुसरण करते हैंfalse
- उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
उत्तर : 1. "यदि केवल निष्कर्ष I अनुसरण करता है"
प्र: ‘AGRO विजन’ महाराष्ट्र के किस शहर में आयोजित किया जा रहा है?
2518 05ddf80b8fb44bc376db594ae
5ddf80b8fb44bc376db594ae- 1नासिकfalse
- 2सोलापुरfalse
- 3नागपुरtrue
- 4मुंबईfalse
- उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
उत्तर : 3. "नागपुर"
प्र: भारतीय इतिहास कांग्रेस का 80 वां अधिवेशन किस शहर में आयोजित किया गया था?
2518 15e0da4155da2a71cdef3f7c7
5e0da4155da2a71cdef3f7c7- 1कन्नूरtrue
- 2त्रिशूरfalse
- 3कोच्चिfalse
- 4तिरुवनंतपुरमfalse
- उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
- Workspace
- SingleChoice

