General English प्रश्न और उत्तर का अभ्यास करें

प्र:

Directions :Read the given passage carefully and answer the following questions. Certain parts have been highlighted to help answer the questions.
  Every year, around one million people die of mosquitoborne diseases according to the World Health Organization (WHO). This is why mosquitoes are considered one of the deadliest living creatures on the planet — not because they are lethal themselves, but because many of the viruses and parasites they transmit are
 In the absence of an effective vaccine for dengue fever, Zika fever, chikungunya and other mosquito-borne diseases, researchers have developed genetic strategies to reduce mosquito populations. One such strategy involves the release into the wild of genetically modified (GM) mosquitoes that express a lethal gene — a strategy believed to have little impact on the overall DNA of wild populations of mosquitoes
 The transfer of new genes from GM organisms to wild or domesticated non-GM populations is a key criticism of GM crops like soybean and corn. There are concerns that the introduction of GM genes into non-target species could have negative consequences for both human and environmental health.
 Oxitec, a company that spun out of research at Oxford University in the early 2000s, developed and trademarked GM Friendly™ mosquitoes (also known as strain OX513A of Aedes aegypti). These male GM mosquitoes have what the company describes as a “self-limiting” gene, which means that when these so-called friendly mosquitoes’ mate, their offspring inherit the self-limiting gene which is supposed to prevent them surviving into adulthood.
 In theory, when these mosquitoes are released in high numbers, a dramatic reduction in the mosquito population should follow. According to research published by Oxitec researchers in 2015, field trials involving recurring releases of Friendly™ mosquitoes demonstrated a reduction of nearly 95 per cent of target populations in Brazil. In these field trials, experiments were not performed to assess whether GM mosquitoes might persist in the wild.
 A recent study from the Powell lab at Yale University has since confirmed that some of the offspring of the GM mosquitoes didn’t succumb to the self-limiting lethal gene and survived to adulthood. They were able to breed with native mosquitoes and thereby introduce some of their genes into the wild population
 Meanwhile, the impact of mosquitoes carrying these new genes remains largely unknown. One significant worry is that a new breed of mosquito might emerge that is more difficult to control. These new genes could also potentially alter evolutionary pressures on viruses carried by mosquitoes, like dengue fever, in unpredictable ways. This includes potentially increasing their virulence or changing their host-insect interactions. These are hypothetical risks that have been raised by scientists, and reflect the need for further study.

Why are mosquitoes considered as one of the deadliest living creatures on earth? 

1435 0

  • 1
    Capability to transmit life threatening diseases.
    सही
    गलत
  • 2
    Mosquito bites cause fatal reactions in human beings
    सही
    गलत
  • 3
    Mosquitoes cannot be killed easily
    सही
    गलत
  • 4
    Both (a) and (c)
    सही
    गलत
  • 5
    None of the above
    सही
    गलत
  • उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
  • Workspace

उत्तर : 1. "Capability to transmit life threatening diseases. "

प्र:

Direction : Read the following passage carefully and answer the question given below it. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the question.
 Governments have traditionally equated economic progress with steel mills and cement factories. While urban centers thrive and city dwellers get rich, hundreds of millions of farmers remain mired in poverty. However fears of food shortages, a rethinking of anti-poverty priorities and the crushing recession in 2008 are causing a dramatic shift in world economic policy in favour of greater support for agriculture.
 The last time when the world’s farmer felt such love was in the 1970s. At that time, as food prices spiked, there was real concern that the world was facing a crisis in which the planet was simply unable to produce enough grain and meat for an expanding population. Government across the developing world and international aid organisations plowed investment into agriculture in the early 1970s, while technological breakthroughs, like high-yield strains of important food crops, boosted production. The result was the Green Revolution and food production exploded. But the Green Revolution became a victim of its own success. Food prices plunged by some 60% by the late 1980s from their peak in the mid-1970s. Policy makers and aid workers turned their attention to the poor’s other pressing needs such as health care and education. Farming got starved of resources and investment. By 2004 aid directed at agriculture sank to 3.5 % and Agriculture lost its glitter. Also as consumer in high-growth giants such as China and India became wealthier they began eating more meat so grain once used for human consumption got diverted to beef up livestock. By early 2008 panicked buying by importing countries and restrictions slapped on grain exports by some big producers helped drive prices upto heights not seen for three decades. Making matters worse land and resources got reallocated to produce cash crops such as biofuels and the result was that voluminous reserves of grain evaporated. Protests broke out across the emerging world and fierce food riots toppled governments. This spurred global leaders into action. This made them aware that food security is one of the fundamental issues in the world that has to be dealt with in order to maintain administrative and political stability. This also spurred the US which traditionally provisioned food aid from American grain surpluses to help needy nations to move towards investing in farm sectors around the globe to boost productive for themselves and be in a better position to feed their own people.
 Africa, which missed out on the first Green Revolution due to poor policy and limited resources, also witnessed a 'change'. Swayed by the success of East Asia the primary poverty-fighting method favoured by many policy-makers in Africa was to get farmers off their farms and into modern jobs in factories and urban centers. But that strategy proved to be highly insufficient. Income levels in the countryside badly trailed those in cities while the FAO estimated that the number of poor going hungry in 2009 reached an all time high at more than one billion. In India on the other hand with only 40% of its farmland irrigated, entire economic boom currently underway is held hostage by the unpredictable monsoon. With much of India’s farming areas suffering from drought this year, the government will have a tough time meeting its economic growth targets. In a report Goldman Sachs, predicted that if this year, too receives weak rains it could cause agriculture to contract by 2 % this fiscal year making the government 7%GDP growth target look "a bit rich". Another green revolution is the need of the hour and to make it a reality, the global community still has much backbreaking farm work to do.           

What prompted leaders throughout the world to take action to boost the agriculture sector in 2008?

1433 0

  • 1
    Coercive tactics by the US which restricted food aid to poor nations
    सही
    गलत
  • 2
    The realisation of the link between food security and political stability
    सही
    गलत
  • 3
    Awareness that performance in agriculture is necessary in order to achieve the targeted GDP
    सही
    गलत
  • 4
    Reports that high-growth countries like China and India were boosting their agriculture sectors to capture the international markets
    सही
    गलत
  • 5
    Their desire to influence developing nations to slow down their industrial development
    सही
    गलत
  • उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
  • Workspace

उत्तर : 2. "The realisation of the link between food security and political stability"

प्र:

In the following question, a sentence has been given in Active/Passive voice. Out of four alternatives suggested, select the one, which best expresses the same sentence in Passive/Active voice.

Lakhs of tourists view the Taj Mahal every year.

1433 0

  • 1
    The Taj Mahal is being viewed by lakhs of tourists every year.
    सही
    गलत
  • 2
    Every year the Taj Mahal is being viewed by lakhs of tourists.
    सही
    गलत
  • 3
    Every year the Taj Mahal was being viewed by lakhs of tourists.
    सही
    गलत
  • 4
    The Taj Mahal is viewed by lakhs of tourists every year.
    सही
    गलत
  • उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
  • Workspace

उत्तर : 4. "The Taj Mahal is viewed by lakhs of tourists every year."

प्र:

In the questions given below, choose the word most opposite in meaning to the given word and mark your answer.

Acerbic

1433 0

  • 1
    Harsh
    सही
    गलत
  • 2
    Bland
    सही
    गलत
  • 3
    Foretell
    सही
    गलत
  • 4
    Amazed
    सही
    गलत
  • उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
  • Workspace

उत्तर : 2. "Bland"

प्र:

Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow-
Parents all over Iceland’s capital Reykjavik embark on a two-hour evening walk around their neighbourhood every weekend, checking on youth hangouts as a 10 pm curfew approaches.The walk in Reykjavik is one step toward Iceland’s success into turning around a crisis in teenage drinking.Focusing on local participation and promoting more music and sports options for students, the island nation in the North Atlantic has dried up a teenage culture of drinking and smoking. Icelandic teenagers now have one of the lowest rates of substance abuse in Europe.The Icelandic Centre for Social Research and Analysis, the institute pioneering the project for the past two decades, says it currently advises 100 communities in 23 countries, from Finland to Chile, on cutting teenage substance abuse. “The key to success is to create healthy communities and by that get healthy individuals, ” said Inga Dora Sigfusdottir, a sociology professor who founded the Youth of Iceland programme, which now has rebranded as Planet Youth.The secret, she says, is to keep young people busy and parents engaged without talking much about drugs or alcohol. That stands in sharp contrast to other anti-abuse programmes which try to sway teenagers with school lectures and scary, disgusting ads showing smokers’ rotten lungs or eggs in a frying pan to represent an intoxicated brain.
“Telling teenagers not to use drugs can backlash and actually get them curious to try them,” Ms Sigfusdottir said. In 1999, when thousands of teenagers would gather in Reykjavik every weekend, surveys showed 56% of Icelandic 16-year-olds drank alcohol and about as many had tried smoking.
Years later, Iceland has the lowest rates for drinking and smoking among the 35 countries measured in the 2015 European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs. On average, 80% of European 16-year-olds have tasted alcohol at least once, compared with 35% in Iceland, the only country where more than half of those students completely abstains from alcohol.
Denmark, another wealthy Nordic country, has the highest rates of teenage drinking, along with Greece, Hungary and the Czech Republic, where 92% to 96% have consumed alcohol. In the US, teen drinking is a significant health concern, because many US teenagers are driving cars and do not have access to good public transport like teenagers in Europe.
Reykjavik mayor Dagur B. Eggertsson said the Icelandic plan “is all about society giving better options” for teens than substance abuse. He believes the wide variety of opportunities that now keep students busy and inspired has dramatically altered the country’s youth culture. Local municipalities like Reykjavik have invested in sport halls, music schools and youth centres.To make the programmes widely available, parents are offered a 500 US dollar
annual voucher toward sports or music programmes for their children.

Researchers say the Planet Youth prevention model is evolving constantly because it is based on annual surveys to detect trends and measure policy effectiveness. By law, introduced when Icelandic police routinely dealt with alcohol-fuelled street gatherings, children under 12 are not allowed to be outside after 8pm without parents and those 13 to 16 not past 10pm. “We tell the kids if they are out too late, polite and nice, and then they go home,” said Heidar Atlason, a veteran member of the patrol. Over Iceland’s harsh winter, one parent admits, evenings sometimes pass without running into any students.

‘Over Iceland’s harsh winter, one parent admits, evenings sometimes pass without running into any students.’ This means -

1433 0

  • 1
    students are not bothered about the efforts made for them.
    सही
    गलत
  • 2
    parents are not motivated to get involved in the programme.
    सही
    गलत
  • 3
    authorities are disappointed that the programme has failed.
    सही
    गलत
  • 4
    the programme is having the right impact on teenagers.
    सही
    गलत
  • उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
  • Workspace

उत्तर : 4. "the programme is having the right impact on teenagers."

      त्रुटि की रिपोर्ट करें

    कृपया संदेश दर्ज करें
    त्रुटि रिपोर्ट सफलतापूर्वक जमा हुई

      त्रुटि की रिपोर्ट करें

    कृपया संदेश दर्ज करें
    त्रुटि रिपोर्ट सफलतापूर्वक जमा हुई

      त्रुटि की रिपोर्ट करें

    कृपया संदेश दर्ज करें
    त्रुटि रिपोर्ट सफलतापूर्वक जमा हुई

      त्रुटि की रिपोर्ट करें

    कृपया संदेश दर्ज करें
    त्रुटि रिपोर्ट सफलतापूर्वक जमा हुई

      त्रुटि की रिपोर्ट करें

    कृपया संदेश दर्ज करें
    त्रुटि रिपोर्ट सफलतापूर्वक जमा हुई

      त्रुटि की रिपोर्ट करें

    कृपया संदेश दर्ज करें
    त्रुटि रिपोर्ट सफलतापूर्वक जमा हुई

      त्रुटि की रिपोर्ट करें

    कृपया संदेश दर्ज करें
    त्रुटि रिपोर्ट सफलतापूर्वक जमा हुई

      त्रुटि की रिपोर्ट करें

    कृपया संदेश दर्ज करें
    त्रुटि रिपोर्ट सफलतापूर्वक जमा हुई