General English Practice Question and Answer

Q:

In the following passage, a word has been deleted. Read the passage carefully and select the most appropriate option to fill in the blank.
 Manpower exporters and overseas recruiters commonly __________ in illegal business practices for short-term _______ gain.

833 0

  • 1
    honoured, professional
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    indulged, monetary
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    regulated, personal
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    thrived, devotional
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 2. "indulged, monetary"
Explanation :

  • "Indulged" suggests involvement or participation, often in a negative or excessive manner, which fits the context of engaging in illegal business practices.
  • "Monetary" pertains to money, and it appropriately describes the type of gain being pursued in the sentence.
  • The other options do not convey the intended meaning in the context of illegal business practices and short-term gain.

Q:

Select the most appropriate option to improve the underlined segment in the given sentence. If there is no need to improve it, select ‘No improvement’.

There was an argument about if we shall move to another city.

833 0

  • 1
    about if we should move
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    on if we shall be moving
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    about whether we should move
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    No improvement
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 3. "about whether we should move"
Explanation :

The correct sentence is:

There was an argument about whether we should move to another city.

Explanation: In this sentence, "if" should be replaced with "whether" to introduce a indirect yes-no question. Additionally, "shall" should be replaced with "should" to form a correct conditional statement.

Q:

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.

The most logical and intelligent people seem to go berserk when talking about snakes. Recently a reputed scientist said with a wise look in his eyes that sand boas have two heads. The other day someone walked into my office and stated that in his village at least cobras mate with rat snakes. About other places he was not sure, he added modestly, but that was how it was in his village.

These stories about snakes are myths. Sand boas have only one head; vine snakes do not peck your eyes out; no snake will drink milk. But it is interesting to try and trace the origin of these untruths. The one about the sand boas two heads obviously exists because the short, stumpy tail of this snake looks remarkably like the head, an effective device to fool predators. Or take the one about vine snakes pecking at eyes. It was ‘probably started by a vine snake that had a bad aim, as snakes, when provoked, will bite the most prominent projection of the offender, which is usually the nose.

But the most interesting one is about snakes coming to the scene of killing to take revenge. It so happens that when injured or under stress, a snake exudes, a large quantity of musk. Musk is a powerful sex attractant, the snakes’ equivalent of after-shave lotion. So after a snake is killed, the ground around still has this smell and naturally a snake of the same species passing by will lick its lips and come to investigate. The killer of the snake, who is probably worried if the pooja he performed was adequate to liquidate the killing of a snake, sees the second snake and is convinced that it was not.

The Irula tribals have a good answer to the query about whether cobras have jewels in their heads; “If they did, we wouldn’t be snake catchers, we would be rajas!”

Irula tribals are

832 0

  • 1
    snake lovers.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    worshippers of snakes.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    snake killers.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    snake catchers.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 4. "snake catchers."

Q:

Comprehension: Read the following passage and answer the questions given after it.

Since September, at least 25 people have died and thousands have been made homeless. Every state and territory in Australia has experienced fires this summer. But the biggest fires burn along stretches of the eastern and southern coast, where most of the population lives. This includes areas around Sydney and Adelaide. More than 6.3 million hectares (63,000 sq km or 15.6 million acres) have been burned so far – one hectare is roughly the size of a sports field. To put that in perspective, around 800,000 hectares were engulfed in a bush fire in 2018 in California. Australia has always experienced bushfires – it has a "fire season". But this year they are a lot worse than normal.

Fires are usually caused by lightning strikes or accidentally by a spark – but some fires are also started deliberately. This year, a natural weather phenomenon known as the ‘Indian Ocean Dipole’ has meant a hot, dry spell across the country. This year, Australia twice set a new temperature record: an average maximum of 41.9°C was recorded on 18 December. That comes on top of a long period of drought.

Scientists have long warned that this hotter, drier climate will contribute to fires becoming more frequent and more intense. The more extreme weather patterns and higher temperatures increase the risk of bushfires and allow them to spread faster and wider. Fire fighters are spraying water and fire retardant from planes and helicopters as well as from the ground. But fighting bush fires is extremely difficult and often authorities have to focus on just stopping the spread, rather than putting the fire out. The spread can for instance be best contained by digging earth boundaries to stop the flames from spreading. The priority is saving lives.

Professional fire fighters are the first in line to battle the flames, but they are outnumbered by the thousands of volunteers. Three of them have died. There's also help coming from abroad: the US, Canada and New Zealand have sent fire fighters to help. Australia's police, military and navy are involved in rescue and evacuation efforts. While people can flee the fires and are being evacuated if need be, the flames are devastating wildlife in the affected areas. One study estimated that half a billion animals have died in New South Wales alone.

Zookeepers take animals home to save them from fire, but the fires don't only kill animals directly, they also destroy the habitat, leaving the survivors vulnerable even when the fires have gone. So the true scale of loss isn't yet clear. Experts say more than 100,000 cows and sheep may also have been lost, which is devastating for farmers.

Each state runs its own emergency operation, but Prime Minister Scott Morrison has promised better funding for fire-fighting and payouts for volunteer fire fighters, and an additional A$2billion ($1.4billion; £1billion) for the recovery. But the national government has come under strong criticism from its opponents that it has not been doing enough against climate change. The country is one of the world's biggest per capita greenhouse gas emitters but under international agreements it has committed itself to reduction targets

Which statement is NOT true according to the passage?

832 0

  • 1
    Zookeepers take animals home to save them from fire.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    The volunteers outnumber the professional fire fighters in Australia.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    Around 800,000 hectares have been destroyed due to a bush fire in Australia.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    Australia is one of the world's biggest per capita greenhouse gas emitters.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 3. "Around 800,000 hectares have been destroyed due to a bush fire in Australia."

  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 3. "begins "

Q:

You have eight brief passages with 10 questions following each passage. Read the passages carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives

There is a general consensus that ‘International Understanding’ need to be taught as a separate subject at the school stage as that would add to the curricular load which is already too heavy. Instead it should be woven into the curriculum and the numerous opportunities that present themselves while teaching normal school subjects may be intelligently and imaginatively used by the teacher to promote International Understanding.

The school subjects which can be most profitably used for this purpose are History, Geography, Civics, Economics, Sociology, Political Science, Social Sciences, Languages as well as Physical and Life Sciences. However, at the higher education level, international education can be prescribed as a separate subject of study. In fact, the present situation in India broadly conforms to this consensus so far as the school stage is concerned.

At the under-graduate and the post-graduate levels, courses of study in subjects like History, Geography, Economics, Political Science, International Relations, International Law and International Organization have been prescribed by most of the universities and these contain content which has a direct or indirect bearing on promoting UNESCO ideals

On reading Para 1, it can be inferred that

831 0

  • 1
    all the subjects at school level may not be helpful in promoting International Understanding.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    school subjects may be used creatively to promote International Understanding.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    international Understanding may be treated as a separate subject in schools.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    the school curriculum is too heavy to incorporate International Understanding.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 2. "school subjects may be used creatively to promote International Understanding. "

Q:

Select the option that expresses the given sentence in active voice.
 The new bride is going to be admired by everyone in the family.

831 0

  • 1
    Everybody in the family is going to admire the new bride.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    Everybody in the family was admiring the new bride.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    Everybody in the family has been going to admire the new bride.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    Everybody in the family was going to admire the new bride.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 1. "Everybody in the family is going to admire the new bride."

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully