Comprehension Test Questions and Answers प्रश्न और उत्तर का अभ्यास करें
8 प्र:निर्देश: दो कथनों के बाद दो निष्कर्ष I और II दिए गए हैं। आपको दोनों कथनों को सत्य मानना है भले ही वे सर्वज्ञात तथ्यों से भिन्न प्रतीत होते हों। आपको तय करना है कि दिए गए कथनों में से कौन सा निष्कर्ष निश्चित रूप से निकाला गया है:
The author used ‘individual opinions’, ‘attitudes’ and ‘preferences’ as examples of
830 06391b53c34f83f1472a609af
6391b53c34f83f1472a609af- 1objective data about the interviewees.false
- 2abstract philosophical concepts irrelevant to the interview process.false
- 3psychological properties particular to a given interviewee.true
- 4likes and dislikes common to interviewers and interviewees.false
- उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
उत्तर : 3. "psychological properties particular to a given interviewee."
प्र:Directions: Read the following passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
The most logical and intelligent people seem to go berserk when talking about snakes. Recently a reputed scientist said with a wise look in his eyes that sand boas have two heads. The other day someone walked into my office and stated that in his village at least cobras mate with rat snakes. About other places he was not sure, he added modestly, but that was how it was in his village.
These stories about snakes are myths. Sand boas have only one head; vine snakes do not peck your eyes out; no snake will drink milk. But it is interesting to try and trace the origin of these untruths. The one about the sand boas two heads obviously exists because the short, stumpy tail of this snake looks remarkably like the head, an effective device to fool predators. Or take the one about vine snakes pecking at eyes. It was ‘probably started by a vine snake that had a bad aim, as snakes, when provoked, will bite the most prominent projection of the offender, which is usually the nose.
But the most interesting one is about snakes coming to the scene of killing to take revenge. It so happens that when injured or under stress, a snake exudes, a large quantity of musk. Musk is a powerful sex attractant, the snakes’ equivalent of after-shave lotion. So after a snake is killed, the ground around still has this smell and naturally a snake of the same species passing by will lick its lips and come to investigate. The killer of the snake, who is probably worried if the pooja he performed was adequate to liquidate the killing of a snake, sees the second snake and is convinced that it was not.
The Irula tribals have a good answer to the query about whether cobras have jewels in their heads; “If they did, we wouldn’t be snake catchers, we would be rajas!”
According to the passage, musk
830 063bd542661d62119f1d4dbb4
63bd542661d62119f1d4dbb4- 1is a sex attractant.true
- 2is an after-shave lotion.false
- 3is a poison aimed at the offender.false
- 4attracts other snakes to take revengefalse
- उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
उत्तर : 1. "is a sex attractant. "
प्र:Read the passage carefully and give the answer of following questions.
Like all visions, this one begins with a dream is of a stresses education system throughout India. That where there is stress it is the exception, not arising out of the system but out of some aberration or other. The extension of that dream is that the children, -thus growing up free will feel better disposed to arrive at the ultimate point of all living, the giving and receiving of love without limits. That growing up in such an atmosphere they become effortlessly harbingers of peace to the world, which is what it seems India used to be in Vedic times. But whatever about the nation's role in the world tomorrow, what is needed is such relationships as both arise out of and strengthen a deep sense of meaning, of self-confidence, of focus, and above all, of peace.
We want that, for our kids, their reach should exceed their grasp, that the accomplishment of goals be only challenges to greater things, that sensing final arrival is either an illusion or an indication that the dream was itself originally petty. We went that they be open to the impossible, the barely imaginable, the almost magical.
How will the world be benefited by the loving nature with which children will grow up and communicate with others?
830 05f3a1ddd79d2942e2b7a1172
5f3a1ddd79d2942e2b7a1172Like all visions, this one begins with a dream is of a stresses education system throughout India. That where there is stress it is the exception, not arising out of the system but out of some aberration or other. The extension of that dream is that the children, -thus growing up free will feel better disposed to arrive at the ultimate point of all living, the giving and receiving of love without limits. That growing up in such an atmosphere they become effortlessly harbingers of peace to the world, which is what it seems India used to be in Vedic times. But whatever about the nation's role in the world tomorrow, what is needed is such relationships as both arise out of and strengthen a deep sense of meaning, of self-confidence, of focus, and above all, of peace.
We want that, for our kids, their reach should exceed their grasp, that the accomplishment of goals be only challenges to greater things, that sensing final arrival is either an illusion or an indication that the dream was itself originally petty. We went that they be open to the impossible, the barely imaginable, the almost magical.
- 1Children growing up in such an environment will bring tranquillity and peace to the worldtrue
- 2They will spread love and lessen differencesfalse
- 3They will be able to trigger off fast progress and greater developmentfalse
- 4A better bonding will be created between individuals and the social environment will be betteredfalse
- उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
उत्तर : 1. "Children growing up in such an environment will bring tranquillity and peace to the world"
- उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
उत्तर : 2. "Capacity"
प्र:You have eight brief passages with 10 questions following each passage. Read the passages carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives
A farmer accompanied by his young son was driving his ass to the market in the hope of selling the ass for a good price. On the road, they met a bevy of girls who laughed and exclaimed, “See this pair of fools ? They are trudging along the dusty road, when they can be riding !” The man thought that there was sense in what they were saying. So he mounted his son on the ass and he walked at the side. Presently, they met some of his old friends, who greeted him and said, “You’ll spoil your son, by letting him ride while you toil along on foot! Make him walk. It’ll be good for him.” The farmer followed their advice and took his son’s place on the back of the ass while the boy trudged along behind. They would not have gone far, they were seen by women and children. The farmer heard them say, “What a selfish old man ! He rides in comfort, but lets his poor little fellow walk the distance.” So he asked his son to get up behind him. Further along the road, they met some travellers. They asked the farmer whether the ass was his property or was it hired for the purpose. The farmer told them that he was taking his ass to the market to sell it. The travellers said, “Good Heavens ! With the load like this, the poor beast will look exhausted and no one would like to purchase him. Why don’t you carry him.” Immediately, the farmer got off the ass, tied its legs with the rope and slung him on a pole and carried him in between them. This was such an absurd sight that people laughed at it. They called the farmer and his son lunatics. They had then reached a bridge over a river. Frightened by the noise around, the ass struggled, kicked, broke the pole, fell into the river and died. The farmer returned home vexed and ashamed. In trying to please all, he in fact, had pleased none and he had lost the ass in the transaction.
On seeing the farmer and his son walking along with the ass, the girls
828 063a980aaf415fc71cc4362c0
63a980aaf415fc71cc4362c0- 1called the farmer and his son fools for not riding the ass.true
- 2wondered at the dutiful father and son.false
- 3asked the farmer to take them also to the market.false
- 4sympathized with the beast of burden.false
- उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
उत्तर : 1. "called the farmer and his son fools for not riding the ass. "
- उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
उत्तर : 4. "Repetition"
प्र:Directions: You have two brief passages with questions following each passage. Read the passages carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives
Ram had never thought much about the origin of wealth or inequalities in life. It was his firm belief that if this world was not good, the next would be good, and this faith sustained him. He was not like some others whom he knew, who would sell their souls to the devil. He always thought of God before doing anything. He lived the life of an honest man. He had not married but did not desire another man’s wife. He believed that women weakened men as was described in the story of Samson and Delilah.
From the above passage we understand that Ram was
826 063a978f9e541fa7a0117de64
63a978f9e541fa7a0117de64- 1not highly educated.false
- 2a man of simple faith.true
- 3a deeply pessimistic man.false
- 4a scholar of scriptures.false
- उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
उत्तर : 2. "a man of simple faith. "
प्र:Read the following passage carefully and give the answer of following questions.
Art both reflects and interprets the notion that produced it. Portraiture was the dominant theme of British painting up to the end of the eighteenth century because of a persistent demand for it. It would be unfair to say that human vanity and pride of possessions were the only reasons for this persistent demand, but certainly these motives played their part in shaping the course of British painting. Generally speaking, it is the artist's enthusiasm that accounts for the vitality of the picture, but it is the client who dictates its subject-matter. The history of national enthusiasms can be pretty accurately estimated by examining the subject-matter of a nation's art.
There is one type of subject which recurs again and again in British painting of the late eighteenth century and the jart half of the nineteenth and which is hardly met with in the jart of any other country ---- the sporting picture, or rather the picture in which a love of outdoor life is directed into the channel of sport. The sporting picture is really an extension of the conversation piece. In it the emphasis is even more firmly based on the descriptive side of painting. It made severe demands on the artist and it must be-confessed that painters capable of satisfying these demands were rare. The ability to paint a reasonably convincing landscape is not often combined with the necessary knowledge of horses and dogs in movement and the power to introduce a portrait when necessary. To weld such diverse elements into a satisfactory aesthetic unity requires exceptional ability. It is not surprising, therefore, that while sporting pictures abound in England, especially in the private collections of country squires, not many of them are of real importance as works of art. What makes the sporting picture worth noting in, a history of British painting is the fact that it is as truly indigenous and as truly popular a form of art in England as was the religious ikon in Russia.
Up to the end of the eighteenth century British artists chiefly painted portraits because
826 05f3a26181269c22e1267bdf6
5f3a26181269c22e1267bdf6There is one type of subject which recurs again and again in British painting of the late eighteenth century and the jart half of the nineteenth and which is hardly met with in the jart of any other country ---- the sporting picture, or rather the picture in which a love of outdoor life is directed into the channel of sport. The sporting picture is really an extension of the conversation piece. In it the emphasis is even more firmly based on the descriptive side of painting. It made severe demands on the artist and it must be-confessed that painters capable of satisfying these demands were rare. The ability to paint a reasonably convincing landscape is not often combined with the necessary knowledge of horses and dogs in movement and the power to introduce a portrait when necessary. To weld such diverse elements into a satisfactory aesthetic unity requires exceptional ability. It is not surprising, therefore, that while sporting pictures abound in England, especially in the private collections of country squires, not many of them are of real importance as works of art. What makes the sporting picture worth noting in, a history of British painting is the fact that it is as truly indigenous and as truly popular a form of art in England as was the religious ikon in Russia.
- 1they could only paint portraits and nothing elsefalse
- 2they were religiously devoted towards portrait painting and nothing elsefalse
- 3more and more people repeatedly wanted artists to paint portraits and nothing elsetrue
- 4they were highly paid for portrait paintingfalse
- उत्तर देखेंउत्तर छिपाएं
- Workspace
- SingleChoice

